Group(s)
YHT22S, SAU19SPS, SAU19SPA
Max Seats
Not applicable
Evaluation Criteria
0-5
Language of Instruction
Finnish, English
Type of Course
Avoin amk, Electrical engineering, Engineering, Online learning, Non-Stop Studies (nonstop), Studies in English
Responsible Teacher
Esa Silomaa
Mode of Delivery
R&D Studies: 0.00 cr
Virtual Studies: 0.00 cr
Contact Teaching: 5 cr
Teacher(s)
Esa Silomaa
Smaller Group(s)
Avoin amk
Evaluation Criteria
0-5
Assessment Methods and Criteria
The course evaluation consists of several Moodle sub-evaluations.
The total score is the average of these sub-evaluations.
Each part of the course must be passed.
Planned Learning Activities and Teaching Methods
The course is conducted as an independent study.
Learning environment is Moodle. https://moodle.oulu.fi/course/view.php?id=13811
Location and time
The course will be available from September 2022.
Completion of the course is independent study independent of time and place.
Learning environments
Not applicable
Recommended or Required Reading
The study material is listed on the course's Moodle page.
Further Information
For questions related to the course, email is the best communication channel.
Completion Alternatives
Not applicable
Teacher(s)
Esa Silomaa
Work Placement and Working Life Connections
Not applicable
Exam Schedule
The parts of the course can be completed after the overall evaluation.
International Connections
Not applicable
Student's Time Use and Workload
The workload of the course is 5 credits.
Learning Progress
Not applicable
Evaluation criteria accepted
1-2: Theory:
-The theoretical examination of the topic is limited or one-sided and there is no criticism of the source. The compiled theory is loose or deals with topics that are irrelevant to the task.
Professionalism:
-The work does not involve the management of working methods in the field and the justification of choices. Working methods in the field have been applied, but the reliability of the work is not demonstrated.
Evaluation of the result:
-Conclusions remain loose. Critical evaluation of results is weak. Further development remains unaddressed.
Presentation of the work
-The report follows the principles of good writing, but the whole is fragmented or incomplete, and there are shortcomings in language and notation.
3-4: Theory
-The author has searched for the most important sources of the topic and combined them to explain the background and methods of the work.
Professionalism
-The connection between the compiled background theory and the practice remains practical. The author has performed well in a professional capacity in the field.
Evaluation of the result
-The author has presented the conclusions in a variety of ways, justifying them and critically evaluating them. The author presents the possibilities for further development of the work.
Presentation of the work
-The report is a coherent whole, but there is uncertainty about the language and notation.
5: Theory
-The author has acquired a broad and reliable theoretical view of the subject and presents it as a concise and substantiated whole.
The use of sources is relevant and critical.
Professionalism
-Previous information has been used skillfully to select solutions and justify them. The author has developed working methods in the field or applied them in a new or challenging situation.
Evaluation of the result
-The significance and usability of the work has been demonstrated and future development has been extensively and appropriately assessed. The author has evaluated the reliability of the final result expertly and in relation to the existing information
Presentation of the work
-The report is a structured and convincing entity that describes the topic of the work and the work process. The report and the writing process show a good command and application of professional language and notation and writing principles.
Evaluation criteria failed
Not applicable
Group(s)
YHT23S, SAU20SPS
Max Seats
Not applicable
Evaluation Criteria
0-5
Language of Instruction
Finnish, English
Type of Course
Avoin amk, Online learning, Non-Stop Studies (nonstop), Studies in English, Electrical Engineering, Open UAS
Responsible Teacher
Esa Silomaa
Mode of Delivery
R&D Studies: 0.00 cr
Virtual Studies: 0.00 cr
Contact Teaching: 5 cr
Teacher(s)
Esa Silomaa
Smaller Group(s)
Tutkinto-opiskelijat, Avoin AMK
Evaluation Criteria
0-5
Assessment Methods and Criteria
The course evaluation consists of several Moodle sub-evaluations.
The total score is the average of these sub-evaluations.
Each part of the course must be passed.
Planned Learning Activities and Teaching Methods
The course is conducted as an independent study.
Learning environment is Moodle. https://moodle.oulu.fi/course/view.php?id=19121
Moodle registration key: Moodle
Location and time
The course will be available from September 2023.
Completion of the course is independent study independent of time and place.
Learning environments
Not applicable
Recommended or Required Reading
The study material is listed on the course's Moodle page.
Further Information
For questions related to the course, email is the best communication channel.
I do not use Moodle communication channels.
Completion Alternatives
Not applicable
Teacher(s)
Esa Silomaa
Work Placement and Working Life Connections
Not applicable
Exam Schedule
The parts of the course can be completed after the overall evaluation.
International Connections
Not applicable
Student's Time Use and Workload
The workload of the course is 5 credits.
Learning Progress
Not applicable
Evaluation criteria accepted
1-2: -To pass the course the participants have to pass at least three study areas.
Theory:
-The theoretical examination of the topic is limited or one-sided and there is no criticism of the source. The compiled theory is loose or deals with topics that are irrelevant to the task.
Professionalism:
-The work does not involve the management of working methods in the field and the justification of choices. Working methods in the field have been applied, but the reliability of the work is not demonstrated.
Evaluation of the result:
-Conclusions remain loose. Critical evaluation of results is weak. Further development remains unaddressed.
Presentation of the work
-The report follows the principles of good writing, but the whole is fragmented or incomplete, and there are shortcomings in language and notation.
3-4: -Maximum mark for three completed study areas is three.
Theory
-The author has searched for the most important sources of the topic and combined them to explain the background and methods of the work.
Professionalism
-The connection between the compiled background theory and the practice remains practical. The author has performed well in a professional capacity in the field.
Evaluation of the result
-The author has presented the conclusions in a variety of ways, justifying them and critically evaluating them. The author presents the possibilities for further development of the work.
Presentation of the work
-The report is a coherent whole, but there is uncertainty about the language and notation.
5: -Mark five requires that all five study areas have been completed.
Theory
-The author has acquired a broad and reliable theoretical view of the subject and presents it as a concise and substantiated whole.
The use of sources is relevant and critical.
Professionalism
-Previous information has been used skillfully to select solutions and justify them. The author has developed working methods in the field or applied them in a new or challenging situation.
Evaluation of the result
-The significance and usability of the work has been demonstrated and future development has been extensively and appropriately assessed. The author has evaluated the reliability of the final result expertly and in relation to the existing information
Presentation of the work
-The report is a structured and convincing entity that describes the topic of the work and the work process. The report and the writing process show a good command and application of professional language and notation and writing principles.
Evaluation criteria failed
Not applicable